Tesla Faces Lawsuit Over Fatal Autopilot Crash
The family of Genesis Giovanni Mendoza-Martinez has filed a lawsuit against Tesla following a fatal crash involving the company’s Autopilot system. The incident, which occurred in February 2023, resulted in Mendoza-Martinez’s death when his Tesla Model S collided with a firetruck in San Francisco.
The lawsuit alleges that Tesla CEO Elon Musk misled the public about the capabilities of the company’s driver assistance software. According to the complaint, Mendoza-Martinez made no manual inputs during the 12 minutes leading up to the crash, suggesting he believed the car could drive itself.
The family’s legal team argues that Tesla’s marketing led Mendoza-Martinez to overestimate the vehicle’s autonomous capabilities. They point to Musk’s online posts as evidence of misrepresentation, claiming that Tesla overstated the self-driving abilities of its vehicles.
In response, Tesla has attributed the crash to Mendoza-Martinez’s negligence, setting the stage for a legal battle over responsibility and the marketing of autonomous driving features.
Attorney Brett Schreiber, representing the family, contends that Tesla is using public roads to test incomplete autonomous technology. This case adds to the growing scrutiny of Tesla’s self-driving software, with the company already facing multiple government investigations regarding its safety.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has included Mendoza-Martinez’s crash in its ongoing investigation into Tesla’s Autopilot system. Additionally, the California Department of Motor Vehicles has sued Tesla for false advertising related to its Full Self-Driving (FSD) software.
The NHTSA’s findings suggest that FSD users were not adequately engaged in driving, raising concerns about the system’s safety. With at least 15 other active cases involving Tesla’s Autopilot or FSD software linked to crashes, this lawsuit further intensifies the debate over the marketing and safety practices of Tesla’s self-driving technology.
As investigations continue and legal proceedings unfold, the case highlights the broader implications of autonomous driving technology and the responsibilities of manufacturers in ensuring public safety.