In a stunning turn of events, the Federal Trade Commission has filed a lawsuit against Grand Canyon University, the largest Christian University in the United States. The lawsuit alleges that the university engaged in deceptive advertising practices for its doctoral programs, as well as illegal telemarketing activities. This development has sent shockwaves through the education community and has raised questions about the integrity of for-profit institutions.
According to the lawsuit, Grand Canyon University falsely claimed that its doctoral programs were accredited and would lead to professional licensure. In reality, the programs were not accredited and did not meet the requirements for licensure in several states. This misleading information not only deceived prospective students but also potentially jeopardized their career prospects.
Furthermore, the university is accused of engaging in illegal telemarketing practices by making unsolicited calls to potential students. These calls allegedly used aggressive and misleading tactics to persuade individuals to enroll in the university’s programs. Such practices not only violate consumer protection laws but also undermine the trust and confidence that students should have in educational institutions.
The lawsuit against Grand Canyon University serves as a reminder of the importance of transparency and accountability in higher education. Students and their families invest significant time, money, and effort in pursuing a degree, and it is essential that they are provided with accurate and honest information. This case should serve as a wake-up call for other institutions to evaluate their advertising practices and ensure compliance with regulations.
The lawsuit against Grand Canyon University is a significant development that highlights the need for increased scrutiny of for-profit institutions. The allegations of deceptive advertising and illegal telemarketing practices are serious and warrant a thorough investigation. As the legal proceedings unfold, it is crucial that justice is served and that the rights of students are protected. This case should also serve as a catalyst for reforms in the higher education sector to prevent similar incidents in the future.
Read more at Fox Business“