Nippon Steel and U.S. Steel Sue Biden Administration Over Blocked Merger
Nippon Steel and U.S. Steel have filed a federal lawsuit against the Biden administration, challenging the decision to block Nippon’s $15 billion acquisition of U.S. Steel. The companies claim the decision was politically motivated and lacks a rational legal basis.
The lawsuit, filed in both the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia and the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, argues that the acquisition would enhance U.S. national security rather than compromise it. The companies also accuse Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. and the Steelworkers union of engaging in anticompetitive activities to obstruct the deal.
President Biden’s decision to block the merger was based on national security concerns, emphasizing the importance of maintaining a strong, domestically owned steel industry. This marks the first time a U.S. president has blocked a merger between a U.S. and Japanese firm.
The Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (CFIUS) failed to reach a consensus on the merger, leading to the presidential intervention. The companies allege that CFIUS was instructed not to negotiate or offer counterproposals, suggesting the review process was manipulated to align with Biden’s political agenda.
Nippon Steel had promised a $2.7 billion investment in U.S. Steel’s operations in Indiana and Pennsylvania. U.S. Steel warned that without this investment, it may need to shift production to cheaper non-union electric arc furnaces.
The acquisition was viewed as a strategic move to compete against Chinese dominance in the steel industry. However, the White House spokesperson defended the decision, citing national security risks.
The lawsuit has drawn attention to the political implications of the merger. President-elect Donald Trump has also vowed to block the acquisition, suggesting the use of tax incentives and tariffs to strengthen U.S. Steel.
As news of the lawsuit broke, shares of United States Steel Corp. rose, indicating market interest in the outcome of this legal challenge.
The case highlights the complex interplay between national security concerns, international trade, and domestic industrial policy in the steel sector.